The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-3240•Sharon Sanders v. Lee County School Dist. No. 1
10-3240Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2864
___________
Leticia Sanders, on behalf of D.S.H., *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.
*
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Social Security Administration, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 2, 2012
Filed: February 7, 2012
___________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Leticia Sanders, on behalf of her minor daughter D.S.H., appeals the district
court’s order affirming the denial of supplemental security income benefits. Upon1
de novo review, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart, 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir.
2005), we agree with the district court’s reasons for rejecting the arguments Sanders
raised below, and we decline to consider the new contentions she raises on appeal,
The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the1
Eastern District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
see Flynn v. Chater, 107 F.3d 617, 620 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment
of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.