The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1241•EEOC v. Product Fabricators, Inc.
11-1241Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2697
___________
Michael E. McKinzy, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Union Pacific Railroad Company, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 6, 2012
Filed: January 9, 2012
___________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael McKinzy appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary1
judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see
Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011)
(standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons
given by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Greg Kays, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.