EEOC v. Product Fabricators, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2285
___________
James A. Widtfeldt, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * Tax Court.
*
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 4, 2012
Filed: January 9, 2012
___________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
James Widtfeldt appeals the tax court’s decision dismissing his case for failure1
to properly prosecute, and upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s
determination that his deceased mother’s estate owed a gift tax deficiency, estate tax,
and additions to tax. Following careful review of the record and the parties’
arguments, we agree with the tax court’s decision. See Long v. Comm’r, 742 F.2d
1141, 1143 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (dismissal of case was proper exercise of tax
court’s discretion, where taxpayers were resistant to Commissioner’s attempts to
The Honorable Diane L. Kroupa, United States Tax Court Judge.1

-- 1 of 2 --

reach stipulation, and no stipulation was achieved, and although tax court gave
taxpayers opportunity to state their case for redetermination of deficiencies, they
failed to produce any admissible evidence in support of their claims). Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motions.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --