The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1241•EEOC v. Product Fabricators, Inc.
11-1241Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2077
___________
Pamela Harris, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
QCA Health Plan, Inc., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 6, 2011
Filed: January 20, 2012
___________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Pamela Harris appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment1
in her Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 action. After de novo review, see Tusing v. Des
Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir. 2011), we conclude that
summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable D. Price Marshall, United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.