The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1696•United States v. Gustavo Villa-Maldonado
11-1696Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 30, 2011
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-1424
___________
Eugenio Sanchez Bernal, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of an
v. * Order of the
* Board of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General *
of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: December 15, 2011
Filed: December 20, 2011
___________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Mexican citizen Eugenio Sanchez Bernal petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an immigration judge’s denial
of his application for cancellation of removal. We conclude that substantial evidence
supports the BIA’s determination that Bernal did not meet his burden of
demonstrating he was continuously physically present in the United States for ten
years before he was served with a notice to appear. See Sanchez-Velasco v. Holder,
593 F.3d 733, 735-36 (8th Cir. 2010) (standards of review); Acevedo-Aguilar v.
Mukasey, 517 F.3d 8, 10 (1st Cir. 2008) (holding substantial evidence supported
denial of cancellation of removal where alien’s testimony was inconsistent with other
-- 1 of 2 --
evidence in record regarding relevant dates). Accordingly, we deny the petition. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
- 2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.