The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1696•United States v. Gustavo Villa-Maldonado
11-1696Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 30, 2011
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-1052
___________
*
Friends of Weiner School District, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellant, *
*
Department of Agriculture, *
Involuntary/Third-Party Plaintiff; *
Weiner School District, *
Involuntary/Third-Party Plaintiff, *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
State of Arkansas; Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Department of Emergency *
Management; David Maxwell, in his * [UNPUBLISHED]
official capacity; Arkansas State Board *
of Education; Naccaman Williams, Dr., *
in his official capacity; Ben Mays, Dr., *
in his official capacity; Sherry Burrow, *
in her official capacity; Jim Cooper, in *
his official capacity; Brenda Gullet, in *
her official capacity; Samuel Ledbetter, *
in his official capacity; Alice Williams *
Mahony, in her official capacity; *
Toyce Newton, in her official capacity; *
Vickie Saviers, in her official capacity; *
Arkansas Department of Education; *
Harrisburg School District; *
*
-- 1 of 2 --
Mike Beebe, Governor, in his *
official capacity, *
*
Defendants - Appellees. *
*
___________
Submitted: November 14, 2011
Filed: December 15, 2011
___________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Friends of Weiner School District, a non-profit citizens group, appeals from an
order of the District Court dismissing their Commerce Clause action that alleged1
violations of federal and state law by Appellees in connection with the administrative
consolidation of the Weiner School District with the Harrisburg School District in
Poinsett County, Arkansas. Upon careful de novo review, see LeMay v. U.S. Postal
Service, 450 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that dismissal was proper for
the reasons stated by the District Court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.