The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-3068•Penford Corporation v. Natl. Union Fire Insurance Co.
10-3068Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 29, 2011
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
Nos. 11-1679/1680
___________
Thomas McIntyre; *
Deborah McIntyre, *
*
Appellants, *
* Appeals from the United
v. * States Tax Court.
*
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 3, 2011
Filed: November 4, 2011
___________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated cases, Thomas and Deborah McIntyre appeal the tax
court’s decision upholding a determination made by the Commissioner of Internal1
Revenue of their liability for accuracy-related penalties. Upon careful review, see
Namyst v. Comm’r, 435 F.3d 910, 912 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing tax court’s findings
of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo), we conclude that the
Commissioner’s determination was correct, for the reasons explained by the tax court.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Diane L. Kroupa, United States Tax Court Judge.1
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.