United States v. Edward Joseph Lowen

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2450
___________
Corvin Jerrod Bolden I, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Officer Mark Beaupre, in his * District of Minnesota.
individual capacity; Officer Kristin *
Sturgis, in her individual capacity; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Officer John Engle, in his individual *
capacity; City of Minneapolis, as *
employer; Nurse Donna Doe, in her *
individual capacity, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: June 29, 2011
Filed: July 5, 2011
___________
Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
After a jury rendered a verdict for defendants on Corvin Jerrod Bolden’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, he moved for post-judgment relief, arguing that the district

-- 1 of 2 --

court’s 1 excessive-force instruction was erroneous. The district court denied his
motion and Bolden appeals.
After careful review, this court concludes that the instruction fairly and
adequately represents the evidence and the applicable law. See Campos v. City of Blue
Springs, Mo., 289 F.3d 546, 551-52 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). This court
affirms the judgment and denies the pending motion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --