The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-1665•Charity Wierman v. Casey's General Stores
10-1665Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2011
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-3158
___________
Michael P. Henderson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Mikki Peterick and Mille *
Lacs County Family Services, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 24, 2011
Filed: March 16, 2011
___________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Henderson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record de
novo, see Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Pope, 487 F.3d 590, 598 (8th Cir. 2007)
(standard of review), we find no trialworthy issue as to whether defendants violated
Henderson’s civil rights. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.