United States v. Bobby Walker

09-3517Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2011

Full text

1The Honorable Roberto A. Lange, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2656
___________
Rev. David L. Joe, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
Walgreens Co./ILL; Walgreens Co./ *
ILL, District 311; Jason Frederick, in * [UNPUBLISHED]
his official capacity; Mary Ann Hansen, *
in her official capacity; Kristine Rasby, *
in her official capacity; Frank *
Maxwell, in his official capacity, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 7, 2011
Filed: February 18, 2011
___________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
The Reverend David Joe appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his action asserting both state-law and federal law employment-

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
discrimination claims. On de novo review, we conclude that dismissal of Joe’s state-
law claims was proper. See Jansen v. Lemmon Fed. Credit Union, 562 N.W.2d 122,
124 (S.D. 1997). We also agree with the district court that Joe’s federal claims are
time-barred, and conclude that the facts of this case do not warrant equitable tolling.
See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a). Accordingly, we affirm. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.