United States v. Samuel Acosta

08-3086Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2010

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-1441
___________
Pamela Rhodes, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Arkansas State University, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 4, 2010
Filed: August 11, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Pamela Rhodes appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in her employment-discrimination action against Arkansas State University. After
careful de novo review, see Hannoon v. Fawn Eng’g Corp., 324 F.3d 1041, 1045 (8th
Cir. 2003), we find no error in the district court’s order, see id. at 1048 (elements of
harassment claim); Box v. Principi, 442 F.3d 692, 696 (8th Cir. 2006) (elements of
race-discrimination and retaliation claims). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B. We deny appellee’s pending motion as moot.
______________________________
1The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.