The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-3086•United States v. Samuel Acosta
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-3933
___________
Sokhna Kane, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of
v. * an Order of the Board
* of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney *
General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: August 13, 2010
Filed: August 25, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of her
motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its
discretion. See Clifton v. Holder, 598 F.3d 486, 490-91 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of
review); Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (en
banc) (per curiam) (reopening sua sponte); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1160,
1162 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (untimeliness); Hernandez-Moran v. Gonzales, 408
F.3d 496, 499-500 (8th Cir. 2005) (equitable tolling). Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review.
______________________________
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.