The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1634•United States v. Wesley Running Shield
09-1634Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 28, 2010
1The HONORABLE RALPH R. ERICKSON, United States District Judge for
the District of North Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-3641
___________
David Meador, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of North Dakota.
*
Dan Anderson; Gene Bjerke, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 30, 2010
Filed: May 6, 2010
___________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
David Meador appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a deputy sheriff and the sheriff of
Barnes County, North Dakota, alleging that he was subject to an unlawful arrest in
violation of his constitutional rights. Upon de novo review, we conclude that
summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See
Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S. Ct. 808, 815-16 (2009) (qualified immunity); Thomas v.
Dickel, 213 F.3d 1023, 1026 (8th Cir. 2000) (a failure-to-train claim cannot stand
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
unless there is liability on an underlying substantive claim). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.