The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1363•United States v. Theola Blackmon
09-1363Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2010
1The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-3408
___________
Stephen A. Marino, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
Michael J. Astrue, *
Commissioner of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 7, 2010
Filed: April 30, 2010
___________
Before RILEY, Chief Judge, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Stephen A. Marino appeals following the district court’s 1 order affirming the
denial of disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI)
for the period from February 1999 to August 2004 (arising from a 1999 application);
and reversing and remanding for further consideration of his 2005 SSI application.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
To the extent Marino has properly raised any issues for review concerning his
entitlement to DIB and SSI from February 1999 to August 2004, see Meyers v. Starke,
420 F.3d 738, 743 (8th Cir. 2005) (failure to present issues with some specificity can
result in waiver), we agree with the district court that the ALJ’s opinion is supported
by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, see McNamara v. Astrue, 590 F.3d
607, 610 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). We decline to consider appellee’s
challenge to the district court’s determination that reversal was warranted for further
consideration of Marino’s 2005 SSI application, because appellee did not file a cross-
appeal. See Smith v. Sullivan, 982 F.2d 308, 314 (8th Cir. 1992) (where appellee fails
to file cross-appeal, he is prohibited from attempting to enlarge his rights or lessen his
adversary’s rights). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.