United States v. James Boesen, Jr.

08-3842Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2010

Full text

1The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-2370
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Northern District of Iowa.
David Lee Koebele, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: March 3, 2010
Filed: March 5, 2010
___________
Before BYE, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, David Koebele challenges the sentence the district
court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to an attempted sex offense, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 2422(b). Counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court committed plain
error in imposing an excessive term of supervised release.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
We hold that the district court did not commit plain error in sentencing Koebele
to a 25-year term of supervised release, which is well within the statutory limit of life.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k); United States v. Ristine, 335 F.3d 692, 694 (when defendant
fails to raise timely objection to term of supervised release, review is for plain error).
Further, having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s judgment and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.