The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-3842•United States v. James Boesen, Jr.
08-3842Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2010
1The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendron, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1400
___________
Jimmy Lee Brown, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
Officer William Smith, Texarkana, *
Arkansas, Police Department, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 16, 2010
Filed: March 29, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jimmy Lee Brown appeals from the district court’s 1 orders granting partial
summary judgment and dismissing his suit following a bench trial in his pro se 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action.
Having carefully reviewed the record and the district court’s findings, see
Eckert v. Titan Tire Corp., 514 F.3d 801, 804 (8th Cir. 2008) (review of district
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
court’s fact findings made after bench trial is for clear error, and review of its legal
conclusions and mixed questions of law and fact is de novo); Amrine v. Brooks, 522
F.3d 823, 830 (8th Cir. 2008) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo), we
affirm the district court for the reasons explained in its well-reasoned orders.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.