The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-4000•United States v. Sylvester Littlewind
08-4000Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 26, 2010
1The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-2320
___________
Gary R. Barnes, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 5, 2010
Filed: February 23, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gary R. Barnes appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his suit against his former employer, the City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota , alleging
negligence and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101,
et seq. (ADA). On appeal, he also asserts a retaliation claim. After carefully
reviewing de novo the grant of summary judgment on Barnes’s ADA claims, see
Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we find no basis for
reversal. We decline to consider either Barnes’s negligence claim, which he does not
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
address on appeal, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir.
2004) (claims not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned), or his retaliation claim,
which he presents for the first time on appeal, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914
(8th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.