The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-4000•United States v. Sylvester Littlewind
08-4000Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 26, 2010
1The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1801
___________
Daniel C. Coyle, Sr., *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
v. * District of Missouri.
*
Aquila, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 28, 2010
Filed: February 3, 2010
___________
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Coyle appeals the order of the District Court 1 granting summary
judgment to Aquila, Inc., in his employment-discrimination action. After reviewing
the record de novo, viewing it in the light most favorable to Coyle, we conclude that
summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the District Court. See Didier
v. Schwan Food Co., 465 F.3d 838, 841 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). We
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
decline to consider Coyle's arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Stone
v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.