The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1585•United States v. John Turpin
1The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J.
Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1132
___________
Rudolph George Stanko, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Warden M. Cruz, Local Director/ *
Warden; Michael K. Nalley, Regional * [UNPUBLISHED]
Director; Harley Lappin, Director, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: January 12, 2010
Filed: January 21, 2010
___________
Before BYE, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Rudolph George Stanko appeals the district court’s 1 denial of
his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Upon de novo
review, see Mitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2008) (per
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
curiam), we conclude that habeas relief was properly denied. Accordingly, we affirm
the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.