The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-3021•Shirley Walker v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction
08-3021Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2009
1The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1489
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Owen McMullen, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 7, 2009
Filed: December 10, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Owen McMullen appeals the district court’s1 order denying his motion for a
reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 706 to
the Sentencing Guidelines. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s
decision not to reduce McMullen’s sentence, as the court had considered the amended
Guidelines range at McMullen’s request when he was sentenced, although the
amendment was not yet in effect. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(1) (in determining
whether reduction is warranted, court should determine amended Guidelines range
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
that would have been applicable if amended Guidelines had been in effect); United
States v. Curry, No. 09-1325, 2009 WL 3713702, at *1 (8th Cir. Nov. 9, 2009)
(standard of review).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, and counsel is granted leave to
withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.