The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-3021•Shirley Walker v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction
08-3021Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2009
1The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1019
___________
Stuart Daniel Juarez, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Litow Law Office, P.C., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 1, 2009
Filed: December 9, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this civil suit alleging unfair debt collection practices, Stuart Juarez appeals
from the district court’s 1 order (1) denying him permission to file a second amended
complaint, and (2) granting summary judgment in favor of Litow Law Office, P.C.
After careful review, we affirm. See Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs., 512 F.3d 488, 497
(8th Cir. 2008) (concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
a late-filed motion to amend where the proposed amended complaint contained new
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
theories of recovery); Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006)
(reviewing a grant of summary judgment de novo). See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.