The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-3021•Shirley Walker v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction
08-3021Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2009
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-3411
___________
Wendell Dwayne O’Neal, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Shari Moore, St. Paul City Clerk; Pete *
Crum, St. Paul Police Officer; Yileng * [UNPUBLISHED]
Vang, St. Paul Police Officer; Nikkole *
Graupman, St. Paul Police Officer; *
John Choi, St. Paul City Attorney; *
City of St. Paul, jointly, severally, *
officially, as agents, and municipality, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: November 17, 2009
Filed: December 11, 2009
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Wendell O’Neal appeals the adverse judgment entered in this action alleging
civil rights and other violations stemming from O’Neal’s arrest and conviction for
trespassing in August 2005, and his subsequent efforts to obtain records related to the
-- 1 of 2 --
1The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Janie S. Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
incident. Following careful de novo review of the district court’s 1 judgment and
O’Neal’s arguments on appeal, we conclude that O’Neal did not rebut defendants’
evidence demonstrating they were entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. O’Neal’s pending motions are denied.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.