The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-3021•Shirley Walker v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction
08-3021Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2009
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-3270
___________
Diabate Amadou, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
J. B. Hunt Transport, Inc., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 26, 2009
Filed: December 14, 2009
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Diabate Amadou appeals the district court’s 1order dismissing his civil action
for failure to state a claim for relief, and denying his motion to amend the complaint.
Following de novo review, see O’Neil v. Simplicity, Inc., 574 F.3d 501, 503 (8th Cir.
2009), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district
court, and that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend as
1The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
futile. See Marmo v Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., 457 F.3d 748, 755 (8th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion. 2
______________________________
2We decline to address the numerous issues that Amadou raises for the first time
on appeal. See Flynn v. Chater, 107 F.3d 617, 620 (8th Cir. 1997).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.