The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-3021•Shirley Walker v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction
08-3021Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2009
1The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2138
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Northern District of Iowa.
Eric Lawrence, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 27, 2009
Filed: December 4, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Eric Lawrence appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking
his supervised release, arguing that the 36-month prison term is unreasonable. Upon
careful review, we conclude the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See 18
U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, cmt. n.4 (establishing a sentence above the
recommended revocation range may be warranted where the original sentence resulted
from a downward departure as a reward for substantial assistance); United States v.
Eagle Thunder, 553 F.3d 605, 608-09 (8th Cir. 2009) (holding a revocation sentence
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
above the advisory Guidelines range was not unreasonable where defendant
repeatedly violated supervised release); United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825
(8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review).
We affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.