The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-2092•Mayra Dominguez-Cortez v. Michael B. Mukasey
08-2092Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 30, 2009
1The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1756
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Ali M. Akbar, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 28, 2009
Filed: October 2, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ali Akbar appeals the district court’s1 order reducing his sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The
district court--which had originally sentenced Akbar at the bottom of his Guidelines
range to 188 months in prison--resentenced him at the bottom of his recalculated
Guidelines range to 151 months in prison. Akbar’s argument on appeal that the
district court should be allowed to sentence him below the Guidelines range is
foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See United States v. Starks, 551 F.3d 839, 841-
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
43 (8th Cir.) (modification proceedings under § 3582(c)(2) are more narrow in scope
than original sentencing proceedings; limitations on district court’s authority in
applicable policy statement of U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 are constitutional and enforceable),
cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 2746 (2009); United States v. Snyder, 511 F.3d 813, 818 (8th
Cir.) (one Eighth Circuit panel may not overrule another), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct.
2947 (2008); see also United States v. Harris, 556 F.3d 887, 888 (8th Cir. 2009) (per
curiam) (appellant’s argument that district court had authority to sentence him below
Guidelines range in § 3582(c)(2) sentencing is foreclosed by Starks), petition for cert.
filed, (U.S. May 22, 2009) (No. 08-10701).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.