The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-4491•Ricky Lee McDeid v. State of Minnesota
05-4491Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2009
1The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2605
___________
Randy Craig Teinert, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Rachel K. Paulos, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 3, 2009
Filed: August 14, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Randy Teinert appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing his complaint
for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Hastings
v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that dismissal was
proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
___________________________
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.