The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1031•CDI Energy Services v. West River Pumps
08-1031Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 29, 2009
1The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2018
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Rashaund L. Jackson, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 23, 2009
Filed: May 4, 2009
___________
Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Rashaund Jackson appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after
revoking his supervised release. Upon reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we
conclude Jackson’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413
F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review). The sentence is
within the statutory limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and the sentence resulted from
the district court’s consideration of appropriate factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
See United States v. Nelson, 453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining an
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
appellate court reviews a revocation sentence to determine whether the sentence is
unreasonable in relation to, inter alia, the advisory Guidelines range and the § 3553(a)
factors).
We affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.