The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-3552•Sandra Chronister v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America
07-3552Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2009
1The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2987
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Heron Velez-Paz, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 24, 2009
Filed: April 29, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
After Heron Velez-Paz pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after having been
deported following an aggravated-felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(a), (b)(2), the district court 1 sentenced him within the advisory Guidelines
range to 46 months in prison and 2 years of supervised release. On appeal, his counsel
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). For the reasons
discussed below, we affirm.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Counsel argues that Velez-Paz’s conviction is not supported by sufficient
evidence. We conclude that this argument is foreclosed by Velez-Paz’s unconditional
guilty plea. See United States v. Jennings, 12 F.3d 836, 839 (8th Cir. 1994).
Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,
80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.