The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-3393•United States v. Armendariz Alexander
07-3393Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 27, 2009
1The Honorable Stanley J. Goldberg, United States Tax Court Judge.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-3453
___________
Michael S. Lacy, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * Tax Court.
*
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 28, 2009
Filed: February 3, 2009
___________
Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Lacy challenges the tax court’s1 order dismissing his pro se petition
and imposing a $7,500 penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673. After careful review, we
conclude that the dismissal and the penalty were each proper. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B. All pending motions are denied.
______________________________
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.