The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3903•United States v. Mohammed A. Kattaria
06-3903Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 30, 2009
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-3141
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Nebraska.
*
Zachary Hrasky, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 23, 2009
Filed: January 28, 2009
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Zachary Hrasky pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. He
now appeals the district court’s 1 final judgment, asserting that he is seeking a final
decision from this court so he can petition the Supreme Court for review of this
court’s earlier interlocutory decision in United States v. Hrasky, 453 F.3d 1099 (8th
Cir. 2006) (reversing suppression of evidence), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 2098 (2007).
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
In this appeal, Hrasky does not challenge any ruling by the district court. Regarding
the suppression issue, we conclude that this court’s prior decision is law of the case
and that there is no basis for revisiting it. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.