The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3903•United States v. Mohammed A. Kattaria
06-3903Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 30, 2009
1The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2849
___________
George W. Carlisle, Jr., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
City of St. Peters, HR Department, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 23, 2008
Filed: January 7, 2009
___________
Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
George W. Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see
Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002), we conclude that
summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.