The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-2832•Sidney Lyles, III v. Columbia Public School
07-2832Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2008
1The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1992
___________
Nathan Andrew Bryant, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Department of Defense, Inspector *
General, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 7, 2008
Filed: December 2, 2008
___________
Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Nathan Bryant appeals the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing his civil suit
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After carefully reviewing the record de novo,
see LeMay v. U.S. Postal Serv., 450 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review),
we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. All
Bryant’s pending requests and motions are denied.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.