The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1295•Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Jeremiah Nixon
07-1295Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2008
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1823
___________
David G. Jeep, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit *
Judge, Camden County; Devin M. * Appeal from the United States
Ledom, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, * District Court for the
Camden County; Alex Little, Police * Western District of Missouri.
Officer, #920, City of Osage Beach; *
Tim Taylor, Police Officer, #913, City *
of Osage Beach; W. Steven Rives, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Prosecuting Attorney; W. James *
Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney; Bruce *
Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge; Jay *
Nixon, Attorney General, State of *
Missouri; Camden County; City of *
Osage Beach; State of Missouri, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 6, 2008
Filed: October 10, 2008
___________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
-- 1 of 2 --
1The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-
PER CURIAM.
David Jeep appeals the district court’s 1 orders dismissing his claims against
multiple defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review, we conclude that the orders were
proper for the reasons stated by the district court and that an extended discussion is
not warranted. See Maness v. Dist. Court, 495 F.3d 943, 943-44 (8th Cir. 2007) (per
curiam) (de novo review of dismissals based on immunity); Rouse v. Benson, 193
F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 1999) (district court’s grant of summary judgment reviewed
de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B,
and we deny as moot Jeep’s motion for an expedited appeal.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.