The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1527•United States v. Kristopher Hamberg
07-1527Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 30, 2008
1The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1324
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
Earl Smith, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 18, 2008
Filed: September 23, 2008
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Earl Smith appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion for a reduction
of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 to the
United States Sentencing Guidelines, which reduced the base offense levels in
U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) for cocaine-base offenses.
Smith pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute more than 50 grams
of a mixture containing cocaine base, which subjected him to a mandatory minimum
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
sentence of 120 months in prison. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A); U.S.S.G.
§ 5G1.1(c)(2). Accordingly, Smith is not entitled to a reduction under the retroactive
amendment. See United States v. Jones, 523 F.3d 881, 882 (8th Cir. 2008) (per
curiam). The district court’s judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.