The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1712•United States v. Derrick Howard
07-1712Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 29, 2008
1The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the
Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District
of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2252
___________
Curtis Stewart, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Correctional Medical Services, (CMS); *
Dave Dormire; Arthur Woods; J. * [UNPUBLISHED]
Sulltop; Melody Griffin; Alfred Garcia; *
John A. Matthews; Leon Vickers; *
Raymond Bloomquist; Jeff Bolton; *
Pamela Swartz; David Cochran, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 18, 2008
Filed: August 8, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Curtis Stewart appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for a preliminary
injunction. After carefully reviewing the district court’s decision, see United Indus.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Corp. v. Clorox Co., 140 F.3d 1175, 1178-79 (8th Cir. 1998) (setting forth factors to
be considered by district court in deciding whether to issue preliminary injunction;
stating standard to be applied by appellate court in reviewing district court’s denial of
motion for preliminary injunction), we conclude the district court properly denied
Stewart’s motion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.