The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3118•United States of America v. Billy Cole
06-3118Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 30, 2008
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
________________
No. 08-1718
________________
United States of America,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
Billy Cole,
Defendant – Appellant.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Appeal from the United States
District Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
[UNPUBLISHED]
________________
Submitted: April 22, 2008
Filed: May 7, 2008
________________
Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
________________
PER CURIAM.
Billy Cole appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction
of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based on amendments to the
United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) which reduced certain base
offense levels in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) depending on the quantity of cocaine base
(crack) involved.
The district court denied Cole's motion without any explanation. Because we
are unable to review its order without knowing its reasons, we remand to the district
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
court for the entry of a certified order within 45 days setting forth the reasons why the
motion for reduction was denied. In order to expedite the matter, our panel will retain
jurisdiction over this appeal.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.