Darrin Scott Walker v. Michael Bowersox

06-3118Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 30, 2008

Full text

1The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2869
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Western District of Arkansas.
*
Shawn Sarver, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 8, 2008
Filed: May 16, 2008
___________
Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Shawn Sarver challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he
pleaded guilty to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On appeal, he
argues that the district court erred in applying a 2-level increase for making a threat
of death. See U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F).
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court correctly applied
section 2B3.1(b)(2)(F), because Sarver’s conduct would make a reasonable bank teller

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
fear death. See U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1, comment. (n.6) (intent of provision is to provide
increased offense level for cases in which offender engaged in conduct that would
instill a fear of death in a reasonable victim); United States v. Jennette, 295 F.3d 290,
292 (2d Cir. 2002) (concluding that reasonable teller, when faced with bank robber
who demands money and states that he has gun, normally and reasonably would fear
for his or her life); United States v. Carbaugh, 141 F.3d 791, 794 (7th Cir. 1998)
(holding that statement “I have a gun” can constitute threat of death under Guidelines;
threat of death need not include statement of readiness or willingness to use gun;
reasonable teller would ordinarily experience fear of being shot when robber
confronting her announces he has gun). See generally United States v. Ingram, 501
F.3d 963, 968 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Dec.
5, 2007) (No. 07-8093).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.