The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-2074•James Stephenson v. Ramy El-Batrawi
07-2074Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2008
1The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Sarah
W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1493
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Willix J. Walker, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: March 26, 2008
Filed: April 3, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Willix Walker appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress
bullets, a face mask, and a handgun, arguing that police lacked reasonable suspicion
to initiate the investigative stop of him that had resulted in seizure of the foregoing
evidence. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Walker’s arguments,
we find no basis for reversal. See United States v. Littrell, 439 F.3d 875, 881 (8th Cir.
2006) (clear-error review of district court’s factual findings in support of its denial of
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
motion to suppress, and de novo review of its legal conclusion about whether Fourth
Amendment was violated).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.