The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-2074•James Stephenson v. Ramy El-Batrawi
07-2074Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2008
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2369
___________
United States of America, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Karl Grinbergs, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendant - Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 4, 2008
Filed: April 15, 2008
____________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
This case is back before us from the Supreme Court which vacated our panel
opinion and remanded for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States, 128
S. Ct. 586 (2007). We requested supplemental briefs from the parties which have now
been received by the court. We have observed that the briefing contains many
sentencing arguments which would be better presented to the district court in the first
instance. We therefore consider it appropriate to remand to the district court for
resentencing in light of Gall and all the appropriate sentencing factors. So ordered.
______________________________
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.