The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3552•Gabriel Wade Mills v. John Anderson
06-3552Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2008
1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3797
___________
Dorisene Anderson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Target Corporation, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 3, 2008
Filed: March 10, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Dorisene Anderson appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her former employer,
Target Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Anderson’s
arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517,
520 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.