The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1217•United States of America v. Kelly Foster
07-1217Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2008
1The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
Northern District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-2150
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Jeffrey Glenn Holt, * Northern District of Iowa.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: December 27, 2007
Filed: January 9, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Holt appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his
supervised release, arguing that his sentence is unreasonable. We affirm.
Specifically, we hold that Holt’s 24-month prison sentence is reasonable, as it
is below the statutory maximum, and it resulted from the district court’s consideration
of appropriate factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (upon
revoking supervised release, court may require defendant to serve in prison all or part
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
of supervised release term authorized for offense, without credit for time served on
post-release supervision, maximum prison sentence is 5 years if offense underlying
supervised release was Class A felony); United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733,
740 (8th Cir. 2004) (district court fashioning revocation sentence must consider
relevant matters and state some reason for its decision; court adequately considered
§ 3553(a) factors where it showed awareness of supervised-release violations, criminal
history, suggested Guidelines Chapter 7 range, and statutory maximum).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.