The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3107•United States v. Gabriel A. Nabejar
06-3107Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 28, 2007
1The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1430
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Minnesota.
*
Eric W. Brown, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 23, 2007
Filed: December 3, 2007
___________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Eric Brown appeals the 46-month prison sentence imposed by the district court 1
upon revocation of his supervised release. For reversal, Brown argues that his
sentence is unreasonable, because the advisory Guidelines revocation range of 46-57
months determined by the district court was calculated based on Brown’s commission
of a Grade A violation, whereas his underlying conduct--possession of 45 grams of
methamphetamine--did not constitute a Grade A violation.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
We disagree. Under Minnesota law, Brown’s possession of 45 grams of
methamphetamine subjected him to imprisonment for up to 30 years, see Minn. Stat.
§ 152.021, subdivs. 2(1) & 3(a), and the Guidelines provide, in relevant part, that a
Grade A violation includes “any other federal, state, or local offense that is punishable
by a term of imprisonment exceeding twenty years,” see U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1(a)(1)(B).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.