The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2821•United States v. Scott Donald Wiele
06-2821Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2007
1The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S.
Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3707
___________
Patrick Fitzgerald Ester, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Minnesota.
*
Agent Daniel Paul Faflak, Jr.; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Detective David Sebesta, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 3, 2007
Filed: October 12, 2007
___________
Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Patrick Fitzgerald Ester appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment based on qualified immunity. We have carefully reviewed the record and
considered Ester’s arguments for reversal. See Robinette v. Jones, 476 F.3d 585, 590-
91 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo standard of review). We agree with the district court that
the question whether defendants reasonably believed their actions violated the Fourth
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Amendment turns on the objective reasonableness of their conduct and not on their
subjective intent. See McClendon v. Story County Sheriff’s Office, 403 F.3d 510,
515-16 & n.4 (8th Cir. 2005) (officer’s subjective intent is never relevant under Fourth
Amendment analysis so long as there exists objective basis for seizure). Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Ester’s motion to supplement the
record.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.