The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2821•United States v. Scott Donald Wiele
06-2821Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2007
1The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
Nos. 06-2904/3907
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeals from the United States
* District Court for the
Thomas E. Simmons, Jr., * Western District of Missouri.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: September 24, 2007
Filed: October 5, 2007
___________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
The district court 1 revoked the supervised release of Thomas E. Simmons, Jr.,
and sentenced him to prison. The court later granted the government’s Federal Rule
of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion and reduced his sentence. Simmons filed notices
of appeal from both sentences. In Appeal No. 06-2904, we affirm the judgment of the
district court, noting that counsel makes no argument in his brief regarding the
original revocation sentence. We dismiss Appeal No. 06-3907, in which counsel
argues that the reduced sentence is unreasonable, because we lack jurisdiction to
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
consider a challenge to the reasonableness of a sentence reduced pursuant to Rule
35(b). See United States v. Haskins, 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam).
Last, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.