The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2821•United States v. Scott Donald Wiele
06-2821Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2007
1The Honorable George Howard, Jr., late a United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2221
___________
Phyllis D. Racy, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Arkansas Child Support Enforcement *
Unit, Revenue Division, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 12, 2007
Filed: October 22, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Phyllis Racy appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of her Title
VII action for failure to comply with a discovery order, and argues that counsel should
have been appointed for her. We affirm.
We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the
action, given that Racy ignored defendant’s repeated discovery requests for over a
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
year, ignored the district court’s order compelling her to respond to such requests, and
never provided any justification for her failure to respond. See Doe v. Cassel, 403
F.3d 986, 990 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)
dismissal); Hairston v. Alert Safety Light Prods., Inc., 307 F.3d 717, 718-19 (8th Cir.
2002) (standard of review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) dismissal); Hutchins v. A.G.
Edwards & Sons, Inc., 116 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (8th Cir. 1997) (noncompliance
underlying Rule 41(b) dismissal must be deliberate).
We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to
appoint counsel for Racy, who appeared capable of presenting her case and gave no
indication--below or on appeal--that she could not, without counsel, respond properly
to defendant’s discovery requests. See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791,
794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; relevant factors include ability of indigent
person to investigate facts and present claims).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.