The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3438•United States v. Christopher Lee
06-3438Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 27, 2007
1The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1396
___________
United States, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of South Dakota.
*
Thomas Jensen, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 5, 2007
Filed: September 13, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
The district court 1 revoked Thomas Jensen’s supervised release and sentenced
him to 18 months in prison and 18 months of supervised release. After reviewing the
record, counsel’s brief, and Jensen’s pro se supplemental brief, we conclude that the
court did not clearly err by finding that the government had proved the violations by
a preponderance of the evidence, did not abuse its discretion by revoking his
supervised release, and did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States
v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review); United
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
States v. Carothers, 337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 2003) (standards of review and
burden of proof). We therefore affirm and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.