The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3438•United States v. Christopher Lee
06-3438Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 27, 2007
1The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3642
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Edward G. Boyer, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 6, 2007
Filed: September 14, 2007
___________
Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
The district court 1 revoked Edward G. Boyer’s (Boyer) supervised release and
sentenced him below the advisory revocation range to 18 months in prison and 18
months of supervised release with the first 90 days of supervised release to be served
in an inpatient drug abuse treatment program. Boyer appeals the sentence as
unreasonable. After reviewing the record and Boyer’s arguments, we conclude the
sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir.
2005) (per curiam) (standard of review). In particular, the court was mindful of the
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
need to provide Boyer with drug treatment, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(D), and
fashioned the sentence accordingly: the court imposed a prison term below the
advisory range and required Boyer to spend time in inpatient drug treatment. We
therefore affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.