The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3438•United States v. Christopher Lee
06-3438Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 27, 2007
1The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3092
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
William Hansen, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: August 24, 2007
Filed: September 14, 2007
___________
Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
William Hansen (Hansen) appeals the 120-month statutory mandatory
minimum prison sentence the district court 1 imposed upon his guilty plea to
conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams of a
mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1) and 846. Hansen’s counsel moves to withdraw and has filed a
brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing Hansen’s sentence is
unreasonable under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). This argument is
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
unavailing. See United States v. Gregg, 451 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir. 2006) (stating
“Booker does not relate to statutorily-imposed sentences”).
After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75
(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.