The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-3063•168th and Dodge v. Rave Reviews Cinemas
06-3063Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2007
1The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1816
___________
Paul Love, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Curators of the University of *
Missouri; BTi Employee Screening * [UNPUBLISHED]
Services; Bill Mitchell, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 5, 2007
Filed: August 3, 2007
___________
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Paul Love appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his action based on the
court’s determination that the parties had reached a settlement agreement. Having
carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the parties reached
a settlement agreement at their August 23, 2005 meeting, and that the terms of the
agreement are embodied in the transcript of the meeting. See Chaganti & Assocs.,
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
P.C. v. Nowotny, 470 F.3d 1215, 1221 (8th Cir. 2006) (appeals court reviews for clear
error district court’s finding that settlement agreement existed), cert. denied, 75
U.S.L.W. 3569 (U.S. June 18, 2007) (No. 06-1377). In addition, we find nothing in
the record to support Love’s unsubstantiated claim that he was coerced into the
agreement.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.