The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2929•Suryoadi Suryoadi v. Alberto Gonzales
06-2929Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2007
1The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2019
___________
Theodis Brown, Sr., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
John E. Potter, Postmaster General, *
United States Postal Service, *
*
Appellees. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: July 5, 2007
Filed: July 6, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Theodis Brown, Sr., appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his action alleging employment discrimination. Having carefully
reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289
F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (de novo standard of review). We also conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brown’s motion for
reconsideration. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (abuse-of-
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
discretion standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. In addition, Brown’s motion
to strike is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.